UPS Denies Spousal Benefits to Employees in New Jersey Civil Unions: Lambda Legal to Represent Couples

Find Your State

Know the laws in your state that protect LBGT people and people living with HIV.

Our Sponsors

July 9, 2007

(New York, July 9, 2007) — Today, Lambda Legal produced a letter from UPS that draws a startling distinction between civil unions and marriage in its denial of spousal benefits for employees joined in civil unions.


"This letter shows that when the New Jersey Legislature said same-sex couples are unworthy of marriage, it sent an invitation to everybody to discriminate, and UPS accepted the invitation," said David Buckel, Marriage Project Director of Lambda Legal. "Choosing to discriminate is wrong, but choices like that are inevitable when the state government sets discrimination as the standard."


In a letter outlining why it was denying spousal benefits to Lambda Legal clients and UPS employee Nickie Brazier and her partner Heather Aurand, UPS said, "In summary, you cannot add Ms. Aurand as a spouse because New Jersey law does not treat civil unions the same as marriages,[emphasis added]  and the Plan requires a dependent spouse to be a spouse as defined under applicable state law."


Gabriael "Nickie" Brazier, is a driver for UPS who requested to have her civil union spouse, Heather Aurand, added to UPS's benefit plan so that the couple would not have to continue paying for a second, inferior, health insurance plan for Heather and could stop paying down a second yearly deductible.  Aurand is a stay-at-home parent who is raising the couple's three children.  The couple has been together for over seven years. 


Tom Walton, 42 is also a UPS driver who asked to have his civil union spouse and partner of 15 years with, Mearmon Davis, 44, added to his health care plan and was denied. 


In its October 2006 decision in Lambda Legal's marriage equality lawsuit, Lewis v. Harris, the New Jersey Supreme Court unanimously found that same-sex couples in New Jersey must have equal protection under the law and be granted the rights and responsibilities of marriage, but gave the legislature the opportunity to correct the violation. If the legislature chose civil unions over marriage equality, the Court left open the question of whether or not that choice would be constitutional, reasoning that the legislature should have the chance to explain its decision. A marriage equality bill was introduced on November 20th, and never reached a committee hearing, but a civil union bill was subsequently passed December 2006 and became effective in February 2007.


Lambda Legal estimates that it has responded to calls for help from over 100 same-sex couples who have registered for civil unions and have been denied benefits that they would have received had they been able to marry. With alarm over the mounting problems confronted by same-sex couples joined in civil unions, Assembly Speaker Roberts recently dispatched letters of concern, including one stating: "I respectfully request that they New Jersey Chamber of Commerce—as one of the state's leading business advocacy organizations—strongly urge its members to comply with the spirit and intent of the law so that same-sex couples will not be denied the protections guaranteed by the New Jersey State Constitution."


###


Contact: Jackie Yodashkin T: 212-809-8585 ext. 229; E: jyodashkin@lambdalegal.org


Lambda Legal is a national organization committed to achieving full recognition of the civil rights of lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, transgender people and those with HIV through impact litigation, education and public policy work.

###

Contact Info

Related Issues

Share